विश्वास कीजिये अंधविश्वास नही; तहलका के स्टिंग के मुतालिक

by

सभी की अपनी अलग विचारधारा होती है. मुमकिन है पुत्र के विचार पिता से न मिले और ये भी देखा गया है की पुत्र पिता का अंधभक्त होता है. सबके अपने विचार हैं और वही उनकी विचारधारा बनाती है. तहलका ने एक स्टिंग ऑपरेशन किया; ऑपरेशन कलंक. अभी ये आया ही था की मेरे ऑफिस के मेरे सहयोगियों के तरफ़ से कई सारी प्रतिक्रियाये आने लगी. अब ये हो जाएगा, अब वो हो जाएगा. कुछ के शब्द दूसरो के शब्दों से टकराने लगे. माहौल गर्म हो रहा था.  ब्लोग्गिंग में भी यही हो रहा है. एक के पोस्ट दूसरे के पोस्ट से टकरा रहे हैं, तो कही कमेंट से कमेंट.

मुद्दे की बात यह है की आप आंखो देखी पर विश्वास कीजिये. किसी भी चीज पर अंधविश्वास मत कीजिये. अन्धविश्वास वो करते हैं जो पढे लिखे नही होते हैं. और माशाल्लाहा हम लोग तो पढे लिखे लोग हैं. बाकि आप लोग बेहतर समझ सकते हैं. ये राजनीति के दावपेंच हैं या अगर आप अंधविश्वास करेंगे तो किसी दिन आप उसमे ख़ुद फंस सकते हैं.
Democracy is a daily excercise. लोकतंत्र को बनने में हर रोज मेहनत करनी पड़ती है

indian flag enblem

11 Responses to “विश्वास कीजिये अंधविश्वास नही; तहलका के स्टिंग के मुतालिक”

  1. prakruti Says:

    aapane theek likha hai,aur yah bahut samayik hai. main yadyapi politics se bahut door hoon, par itana bhi door nahin ki apane ird gird ho rahi rajanitik uthapatak se bekhabar rahun. Tahalaka ki koi bhi credibility nahin bachi hai. Kya jaroorat thi is sting operation ki is samay ? Mamala supreme court me chal raha hai, do teen aayog isake liye baitha diye gaye hain, mamale ki sunawai Mumbai HC kar raha hai, CBI inquiry aur investigation kar raha hai, jaanchen chal rahi hai, itana sab hote huye sawal yah hai ki, itane din tak tahalaka wale kya karate rahe?. Agar Tahalaka wale itne jimmedar patrakar hote, to unhe yah sab usi samay karana tha jab dange huye the, itane saal beet gaye, ab yaad aaya Tahalaka walon ko sting operation karane ki , Kyon?
    Is operation kalank se swabhimani Hindoo our adhik kattar ho gaya hai , yah isaka pahala reaction hua hai. Nukasan kisaka hua ? nishchaya hee Musalmano ka, shanti kaa, hinduon ka, kanoon ka, isake doorgami parinam honge. Gujarat ke log pichhale kai saalon se yah sab bhool chuke the aur vikas ki dhara mein aage badha rahe hai. Is Kalank se ho sakata hai phir se rajanitik dhare bandi shuru ho jayegi. Jis tarah se Television par Tarun Tejapal apane bachav mein daleele de rahe the aur bar bar Musalmano ki baat kar rahe the usase we koi Musalamanon ka bhala nahin kar rahe hain. Isame Musalaman Bhaiyon ka nukasan hai aur bhaichare, aapasi vishwas ke liye nukasan denewala hain.
    Rahi baat Narendra Modi ki unhen isase koi pharak nahin padega, we nishchaya hee do tihai bahumat ki majority lekar phir chief minister banenge. Isaka karan yah hai ki, Gujarat ke log samajha gayen hain ki tahalaka ke Tarun Tejapal kis rajneetik dal ke agent hain aur kisake ishare par kaam kar rahen hain. Taraun Tejapal ka yadi narco test kiya jaye to sab sach saamane aa jayeg. Yahi wajah hai ki Congress aur doosare rajnitik dal ise hava nahin de rahen hain, kyonki jo bhi ise hava dega wah nukasaan mein rahega. samay ki najakat samjhakar sab chup baithe hain, kewal wahi chilla rahen hain, jinaka gujarat mein koi janadhar nahin hai.
    Is mamale mein Chunav ayog kya kar raha hai? yah sab samajhane ki baat hai.

  2. sanjay bengani Says:

    आपके विचार बहुत पसन्द आये. इसलिए हम भी चुप है, ऐसा नहीं कहने को कुछ नहीं है, मगर माहौल सही नहीं है. मैंने कहा भी है, धैर्य रखें जो दिख रहा है वह है नहीं, जो है वह दिख नहीं रहा.

    हमारे पत्रकार बन्धू खुश हो रहें है, उन्हे नहीं पता उनके वरिष्ठजन राजनीतिज्ञों से मिल कर कैसा गदां खेल खेला है.

  3. Idetrorce Says:

    very interesting, but I don’t agree with you
    Idetrorce

  4. ashok kumar Says:

    very interesting, i am agree with you
    ashok

  5. GIRIJA SHANKER JAISWAL Says:

    NYAYIK MANAK & JAWABDEHI BILL-2010 ,TATKAL LAGOO HO…..
    CORRUPTED JUDGES JUSTICE WORK SE HATAYE JAYE ?……..
    & PUNISH…..

  6. girija shanker jaiswal Says:

    To, DATE :- 29.06.2011
    The Chief- Justice,
    Honble High Court Of Judicature Of Allahabad,
    ALLAHABAD- ( U.P. )

    Sub: A glaring example of acquittal on extraneous consideration in prevention of corruption Act
    Case

    Honble Sir,
    I seek previledge to bring to your kind notice that criminal case, special trial No.
    04 / 2003, STATE Vs. OMPRAKASH SINGH U / s. 342 , 218 , 504 I.P.C. & 7 / 12 prevention &
    Corruption Act , Police – Station ,CANTT., VARANASI was tried by the special Court P. of C.
    Act , presided over by Smt. PREMKALA SINGH. OMPRAKASH SINGH , a Sub – Inspector of
    Police U.P. and chauki incharge of police chauki –Nadesar under Ps.-CANTT , VARANASI,
    Indulged in malpractice , corruption and made false entries in GENERAL DIARY and illegally
    And unauthorisedly detained me in lock-up . On my complaint DIRECTOR GENERAL Of
    Police was pleased to order to lodge an F.I.R against OMPRAKASH SINGH S.I. & to
    Investigate the matter by ANTICORRUPTION CELL VARANASI UNIT. In due course , charge-
    Sheet was submitted against OMPRAKASH SINGH S.I. and he was tried by the Special
    Court on 13.06.2011 . Smt. PREMKALA SINGH , special Judge , prevention of corruption
    Act, at VARANASI acquitted the accused OMPRAKASH SINGH S.I. without caring for the
    Evidence on record and mainly motivated and based on extraneous consideration of
    Rs. 5.00 Lacs . This assertion of mine meet no proof but the evidence on record
    will speak itself.
    Reading of judgement evidently shows that the judgement has been written only with a view to acquit the accused , had nothing to do with the oral & documentary evidence on record.
    Sir, I have no hesitation in saying that the lower judiciary has become a curse
    for the Society. Your honour may visualeese the situation where a citizen like me dares
    to make complaint and give evidence in court against a corrupt police officer who
    is supposed to be :YAMRAJ : for the public, and when Judge would also sail the
    same boat what redressal will be left to the public. S ir, it is very serious matter of corruption against a Judge , Smt. PREMKALA SINGH
    Of Distt.- VARANASI court and I am hopeful that your honour will be pleased to order an
    Inquiry in this matter, so that truth might come on the surface.

    It is therefore prayed kindly to look into the matter personally and , thorough inquiry
    ( 2 )

    be setup against the presiding officer so that public faith in judicial system may remain in tact.

    Copy to, : COMPLAINANT
    1. HON;BLE The C . J. I. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , NEW-DELHI.
    2. HONBLE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE, VARANASI ( DISTT. )
    H.H.C. ALLAHABAD. ( GIRIJA SHANKER JAISWAL )
    3. DISTT. & SESSION JUDGE , VARANASI. B.12 /86, GAURIGANJ,
    4. CENTRAL LAW MINISTER, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW-DELHI. BHELUPUR,VARANASI-01
    5. PRESIDENT OF INDIA, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW- DELHI. M. 09889360004
    6. PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA, GOVT. OF INDIA,NEW-DELHI 09235859768
    E:mail to, girija.jaiswal@yahoo.com
    7. EX.CHAIRMAN,BAR COUNSIL OF U.P.
    Shri ARUN KUMAR TRIPATHI,ALLAHABAD.
    8. CHAIRMAN, BAR COUNSIL OF U.P., ALLAHABAD.
    9. CHAIRMAN, BAR COUNSIL OF INDIA, 21, Rouse Avenue Institutional Area,
    NEW-DELHI ( INDIA )

  7. voidmanufacturing.wordpress.com Says:

    Great overcome! I need to apprentice since you change your web site, just how can my spouse and i subscribe for your blog page website? A bill forced me to be the tolerable deal. My partner and i were small bit comfortable in this a person’s transmit supplied brilliant translucent strategy

  8. girija jaiswal Says:

    COMPLAINANT FILED NO ACTION

  9. girijashankerjaiswal Says:

    girija shanker jaiswal Says:
    जुलाई 16, 2014 को 7:23 अपराह्न | प्रतिक्रिया
    To, DATE :- 29.06.2011
    The Chief- Justice,
    Honble High Court Of Judicature Of Allahabad,
    ALLAHABAD- ( U.P. )

    Sub: A glaring example of acquittal on extraneous consideration in prevention of corruption Act
    Case

    Honble Sir,
    I seek previledge to bring to your kind notice that criminal case, special trial No.
    04 / 2003, STATE Vs. OMPRAKASH SINGH U / s. 342 , 218 , 504 I.P.C. & 7 / 12 prevention &
    Corruption Act , Police – Station ,CANTT., VARANASI was tried by the special Court P. of C.
    Act , presided over by Smt. PREMKALA SINGH. OMPRAKASH SINGH , a Sub – Inspector of
    Police U.P. and chauki incharge of police chauki –Nadesar under Ps.-CANTT , VARANASI,
    Indulged in malpractice , corruption and made false entries in GENERAL DIARY and illegally
    And unauthorisedly detained me in lock-up . On my complaint DIRECTOR GENERAL Of
    Police was pleased to order to lodge an F.I.R against OMPRAKASH SINGH S.I. & to
    Investigate the matter by ANTICORRUPTION CELL VARANASI UNIT. In due course , charge-
    Sheet was submitted against OMPRAKASH SINGH S.I. and he was tried by the Special
    Court on 13.06.2011 . Smt. PREMKALA SINGH , special Judge , prevention of corruption
    Act, at VARANASI acquitted the accused OMPRAKASH SINGH S.I. without caring for the
    Evidence on record and mainly motivated and based on extraneous consideration of
    Rs. 5.00 Lacs . This assertion of mine meet no proof but the evidence on record
    will speak itself.
    Reading of judgement evidently shows that the judgement has been written only with a view to acquit the accused , had nothing to do with the oral & documentary evidence on record.
    Sir, I have no hesitation in saying that the lower judiciary has become a curse
    for the Society. Your honour may visualeese the situation where a citizen like me dares
    to make complaint and give evidence in court against a corrupt police officer who
    is supposed to be :YAMRAJ : for the public, and when Judge would also sail the
    same boat what redressal will be left to the public. S ir, it is very serious matter of corruption against a Judge , Smt. PREMKALA SINGH
    Of Distt.- VARANASI court and I am hopeful that your honour will be pleased to order an
    Inquiry in this matter, so that truth might come on the surface.

    It is therefore prayed kindly to look into the matter personally and , thorough inquiry
    ( 2 )

    be setup against the presiding officer so that public faith in judicial system may remain in tact.

    Copy to, : COMPLAINANT
    1. HON;BLE The C . J. I. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , NEW-DELHI.
    2. HONBLE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE, VARANASI ( DISTT. )
    H.H.C. ALLAHABAD. ( GIRIJA SHANKER JAISWAL )
    3. DISTT. & SESSION JUDGE , VARANASI. B.12 /86, GAURIGANJ,
    4. CENTRAL LAW MINISTER, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW-DELHI. BHELUPUR,VARANASI-01
    5. PRESIDENT OF INDIA, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW- DELHI. M. 09889360004
    6. PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA, GOVT. OF INDIA,NEW-DELHI 09235859768
    E:mail to, girija.jaiswal@yahoo.com
    7. EX.CHAIRMAN,BAR COUNSIL OF U.P.
    Shri ARUN KUMAR TRIPATHI,ALLAHABAD.
    8. CHAIRMAN, BAR COUNSIL OF U.P., ALLAHABAD.
    9. CHAIRMAN, BAR COUNSIL OF INDIA, 21, Rouse Avenue Institutional Area,
    NEW-DELHI ( INDIA )

    voidmanufacturing.wordpress.com Says:
    जुलाई 24, 2014 को 2:18 पूर्वाह्न | प्रतिक्रिया
    Great overcome! I need to apprentice since you change your web site, just how can my spouse and i subscribe for your blog page website? A bill forced me to be the tolerable deal. My partner and i were small bit comfortable in this a person’s transmit supplied brilliant translucent strategy

  10. girijashankerjaiswal Says:

    COMPLAINT FILED ON MAIL ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT CJ ON DATED 22.03.2016

  11. Sikandar Kumar Mehta Says:

    Agree with you , dear

Leave a reply to Idetrorce जवाब रद्द करें